Induced abortion is the deliberate disruption of the natural pre-natal development of a foetus. Access to foetal diagnosis and gender determination, and legislation concerning induced abortions, and the use of selective abortion, differs between populations.
The global trend is to make abortion easier. In the past 30 years, more than 60 countries have altered their abortion laws. All but four — the US, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Poland — eased access to abortion.
The WHO estimates that more than 50 million unwanted pregnancies are terminated each year, the majority in developing countries. It is however impossible to produce a reliable estimate of induced abortions throughout the world since, in most countries, the majority are performed clandestinely. This is particularly the case for young and unmarried women in countries where abortion is illegal or only performed as a medical intervention when the mother's life is at risk, and where contraception is not widely taught and available. The result is that throughout the Third World, the use of abortion as a method of fertility regulation and control has terrible consequences for women's health.
For example, as many as 10,000 Kenyan teenage girls a year drop out of school because of unwanted pregnancies and abortions. Many try to abort themselves with cocktails of drugs or crude mechanical devices inserted into the uterus. At Kenyatta Hospital, one of the largest public hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa with 2,000 beds, complications from induced and incomplete abortions account for about 50% of gynaecological admissions -- or about 20 patients a day and more than 6,000 a year. A non-profit group considers that one-third of maternal deaths in Kenya are due to unsafe abortions; the WHO figures indicate that the number worldwide is one in eight.
In countries with high birth rates, abortion ratios per 1000 births are thought to be low (WHO report, 1970). By contrast, in recent years induced abortions seem to have exceeded live births in several countries with low birth rates. In China alone, an average of 1 million abortions a year have been performed in the late 1980s and early 1990s, in keeping with the government's campaign to limit population growth. In the former USSR, 90% of first pregnancies end in abortion; there abortions are the main form of birth control and each woman on average undergoes 4-5 abortions in her lifetime. With a rate exceeding 4,000 procedures per day, abortion is by far the most common invasive surgical procedure performed in the USA.
In 1991, 200,000 women had terminations in the UK; the number has been growing steadily for the previous 10 years and most estimates suggest at least half of these pregnancies were in couples who used not contraception. In 1993 in the USA, there are around 1.6 million abortions each year.
Non-surgical abortion using the drug mifepristone (RU486) together with prostaglandins is an abortificant available legally in 1994 in France, Britain and Sweden. There is fierce debate as to its world-wide licensing.
Abortion may harm a woman's health, consequent complications including perforation of the uterus, peritonitis and septicaemia, sometimes resulting in death. Although legalizing abortion where illegal abortion was highly prevalent may decrease the incidence of these complications, the reverse is true where the initial abortion frequency was low. Abortion, because of coercion or over-persuasion by authorities or by those on whom the pregnant woman depends, offends most moral and religious codes. A more positive approach might be to provide moral, social and material assistance to the woman and to her baby when it arrives. Induced abortion can be described as murder (in particular, this is the stance taken by the Roman Catholic Church); it is also considered by many to be the result of immorality and irresponsibility on the part of those performing the abortion, and on the part of the woman on whom it is performed, since it may be argued that she should take the consequences of her immoral or adulterous conduct. Induced abortion, either legal or illegal, tends towards breakdown of society, of morality and of the family and marriage, and leads to promiscuity.
The acceptance of abortion in the popular mind, in behaviour and even in law itself, is a telling sign of an extremely dangerous crisis of the moral sense, which is becoming more and more incapable of distinguishing between good and evil, even when the fundamental right to life is at stake. Given such a grave situation, we need now more than ever to have the courage to look the truth in the eye and to call things by their proper name, without yielding to convenient compromises or to the temptation of self-deception. In this regard the reproach of the Prophet is extremely straightforward: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness" (Isiah 5:20). Especially in the case of abortion there is a widespread use of ambiguous terminology, such as "interruption of pregnancy", which tends to hide abortion's true nature and to attenuate its seriousness in public opinion. Perhaps this linguistic phenomenon is itself a symptom of an uneasiness of conscience. But no word has the power to change the reality of things: procured abortion is the deliberate and direct killing, by whatever means it is carried out, of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence, extending from conception to birth. (Papal Encyclical, Evangelium Vitae, 25 March 1995).
Every 24 hours there are approximately one million conceptions throughout the world. Of these, nature aborts about 500,000, roughly 150,000 are deliberately terminated and the remaining 350,000 conceptions result in live births. As these figures so powerfully indicate, for every three live births one pregnancy is deliberately terminated. The fact that so many women are prepared to face the mental anguish, physical pain, and danger which often accompany an induced abortion, many without even the benefit of anaesthetic, indicates how common, and how passionate, can be the wish to avoid an unwanted birth. In contrast, the risk to the woman's health inherent in carrying out a legal abortion is considerably less than if the pregnancy were allowed to proceed to term. Those who deny a place for programmes to control the number and spacing of children are denying the right of the mother to control her own fertility, the right of the father to restrict the number of children he begets, and the right of the child to be wanted.