Human violence


  • Human dependence on violence
  • Violent people
  • Himsa

Nature

In its more limited sense, violence is an overt act of destruction, the exertion of physical force which harms another, or a type of behaviour that is designed to inflict personal injury to people or damage to property. In law, violence is understood by the adjectives appended to it: it is criminal, domestic, sexual, alcohol-fuelled etc.. When sanctioned by custom or tradition through the institutions of society it becomes institutionalized, even state sanctioned, especially in the most dramatic form as war.

Human acts of violence may be defensive as well as offensive. When offensive they may be premeditated or not, and if not premeditated they may be provoked or unprovoked as in the case of so called senseless violence. Acts of violence may be perpetrated by individuals of any sex or age, or by groups in concerted and pre-planned acts, or spontaneously as in mob-violence. For some violence can be necessary or proportional, while for others, it is occasionally senseless, mostly brutal, never justified. A major non-physical form is structural violence.

In a broader sense, as denoted by the Jain term himsa, violence also includes other harmful acts which do not involve physical assault. These may encompass violent thought, hurtful speech, deceit, greed, and pride or any forms of violation of personhood when applied to humans. The concept can also apply in relation to other life forms. In these broader senses, any act, whether intentional or unintentional, which depersonalizes can be an act of himsa through its transformation of the person into a mere object or be used or manipulated. Hoarding resources may not be an act of violence in its narrow sense but as an act of himsa it is a form of violence in the broader sense. The Jains distinguish 432 types of himsa, some of which do not involve negative intent.

Background

Society has never experienced a period without violence. In all previous periods it appears to have been accepted as part of the natural order. With the industrial and political revolutions, and the emancipation of the individual, perceptions changed and violence was "denaturalized" and became unacceptable. A vision of a civilized society without violence emerged. But this shift required a distinction between unacceptable and "legitimate" violence understood as a response to unlawful rule and domination. It is this legitimate violence which has become characteristic of modern life. This ubiquitous form of aggression which is experienced at home, at work or at school has been called structural violence.

Incidence

Society is most concerned about criminal violence to which it characteristically addresses more penal efforts than to anything else. To a lesser extent there is attention at national levels to juvenile violence, but here the efforts are usually seriously remedial. Civil violence statistics vary according to the presence of political confrontations, labour disputes, governmental repression of individual rights, unemployment and racial tensions.

Claim

  1. Societies may condition their population to accept violence as a legitimate solution to problems, and governments may manipulate groups of people to act violently. Violence has the characteristics of disease and the world suffers both from it and its proposed cure, the violent defence of peace by ideologies, who are prepared to annihilate each other.

Counter claim

  1. If the idea of violence is framed as an aberration, a deviation from the path of normality, there is the risk of unwittingly justifying the neglect of whole segments of society while ignoring the increasing power of violence generated by society itself to isolate and brutalize the individual. As long as history is conceived as the evolution of civilization from barbaric violence to rationality and peace, open and brutal violence is perceived as part of the old order. But the dividing line is an illusion: violence is as much a part of each person as it is of society. A skeptical view of the possibility of eradicating war and violence is necessary. Accepting the world will be free from violence is not the same as accepting violence. Paradoxically, letting go of the idea of eternal peace may increase the ability to make peace.

  2. Some forms of violence, in its broadest sense, are unavoidable. These include medical interventions, destruction of insects and habitats during harvesting. Violence may be the only form of effective self-defence.

Narrower

  1. Youth violence
  2. Violent sports fans
  3. Violent picketing
  4. Violent demonstrations
  5. Violent deaths
  6. Violent crime
  7. Violence in the work place
  8. Violence in comic books
  9. Violence by fanatical environmentalists
  10. Violence as entertainment
  11. Violence as a resource
  12. Violence against prostitutes
  13. Video violence
  14. Union monopoly and violence
  15. Uncontrolled banditry
  16. Structural violence
  17. Slow violence
  18. Sexual violence
  19. Sectarian violence
  20. Revenge
  21. Retaliation
  22. Psychotic violence
  23. Psychological aggression
  24. Political violence
  25. Personal covert himsa
  26. Personal brutality
  27. Millennial violence
  28. Masochism
  29. Killing by humans
  30. Jamming of satellite communications
  31. Interpersonal violence
  32. Indiscriminate violence
  33. Harm to innocent bystanders
  34. Harassment
  35. Gang warfare
  36. Feuds
  37. Culture of violence
  38. Criminally life endangering behaviour
  39. Civil violence
  40. Brutality
  41. Blood vengeance
  42. Abusive treatment of patients in psychiatric hospitals
  43. Abuses by private police forces
  44. Ethical violence


© 2021-2024 AskTheFox.org by Vacilando.org
Official presentation at encyclopedia.uia.org