1. Global strategies
  2. Protecting safety of nongovernmental organization staff engaged on hazardous duties

Protecting safety of nongovernmental organization staff engaged on hazardous duties

  • Ensuring security of humanitarian aid workers in complex emergencies

Description

Aid agencies can and should protect their staff working in emergencies, many of which involve violent conflict, banditry, sexual assaults, landmines and kidnapping.

Context

To ensure the most creative working conditions for its staff, an NGO must strive to provide its staff with a sense of their own security. Any NGO working in conflict must make and re-make regular internal audits of staff emotional welfare and staff security and find practical ways to sustain both. Working in violent conditions exposes NGO staff to a wide range of risks to their personal security and emotional health. Any NGO operating in such environments needs to identify and develop appropriate and flexible procedures for security and staff welfare.

The term 'safety' relates to protection from illness and accidents, whereas 'security' relates to protection from acts of violence and crime. While the security of NGO staff, assets and programmes necessarily requires the investment of considerable time and resources, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that the greatest risks to the well-being of NGO staff arise not from security threats, but from safety issues. Safety threats such as vehicle accidents, malaria, water-borne disease, HIV and other health threats continue to be by far the largest causes of casualties among relief workers.

NGO and other humanitarian workers are subjected to more violence around the world as aid organizations enter situations of political instability to provide food, health care, and other emergency aid. As civilians have become targets of war, the NGOs who assist them are seen as targets as well.

In recent years, the number of security incidents involving humanitarian workers has risen to a frightening level. Humanitarian field staff losing their lives in the accomplishment of their duties is not a new phenomenon for any of the humanitarian organisations operating in the field. If working in conflict situation always involves a certain risk, what is new and particularly horrid and alarming about the tragedies of recent years is that humanitarian workers are targeted and killed deliberately.

Implementation

Recommended practices each NGO should adopt include scenario thinking (what can go wrong), preventive action and clear management protocols, using analysis of local trends in crimes, incidents and tensions. Tools and methods include contact lists, maps, radio equipment, recruitment of local drivers and private security companies, insurance coverage and using the structure of UN personnel security system. NGOs should recognize and manage staff stress. Practical tactics include: have and know radio call ID's for staff and knowing radio protocols (clear channel by repeating "mayday" 3 times); track all agency vehicle movements; have in every vehicle a radio (if possible, hand-held radios for those moving away from the car), plus a first aid kit and mine-prodding equipment such as a long screwdriver or knife with 15 cm blade.

Claim

The safety of nongovernmental organization staff engaged in hazardous duties is a critical issue that demands urgent attention. These brave individuals often operate in conflict zones and disaster-stricken areas, risking their lives to provide essential services. Yet, they frequently lack adequate protection and support. It is imperative that governments, international bodies, and NGOs prioritize their safety through robust security measures, training, and resources. Failing to do so not only endangers lives but undermines the vital work they perform globally.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Counter-claim

While the safety of NGO staff is often highlighted, it is an overblown concern. Many organizations operate in hazardous environments, yet they have successfully managed risks for years. The focus should be on the positive impact these organizations create rather than on perceived dangers. Overemphasizing safety can stifle their vital work and deter passionate individuals from engaging in meaningful, albeit challenging, missions. In reality, the benefits far outweigh the risks involved in their essential duties.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Ensuring safety
Yet to rate

Problem

Reference

Metadata

Database
Global strategies
Type
(E) Emanations of other strategies
Content quality
Yet to rate
 Yet to rate
Language
English
1A4N
J8790
DOCID
12087900
D7NID
201204
Last update
Dec 3, 2024