Vulnerability of environmental systems to globalization

Nature

The vulnerability of environmental systems to globalization refers to the heightened risks and challenges that ecosystems face due to increased global interconnectedness. As trade, migration, and technology facilitate the rapid movement of goods, people, and ideas, environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, and climate change intensify. Global supply chains often prioritize economic growth over ecological sustainability, leading to overexploitation of natural resources and pollution. Additionally, the spread of invasive species and diseases can disrupt local ecosystems. This phenomenon underscores the need for integrated policies that balance economic development with environmental protection to mitigate the adverse effects of globalization on vulnerable ecosystems.

Incidence

By 1997, 44 percent of the original natural habitats of Indonesia were converted to other uses, and even larger portions of its lowland tropical rain forests were lost. Several key coral reefs were decimated by dynamite and cyanide fishing. Indonesia had more types of animal threatened with extinction (600) than any country in the world. All the rivers in Jakarta were dead, choked by acids, alcohol and oils, and a thick smog cloud enveloped the city. Environmental degradation, due to mining in outer Java islands and quarrying for building materials in Java, was constantly increasing, exposing Indonesians to erosions, forest fires the size of Belgium and landslides.

Claim

The developed, northern nations, who have been polluting for years, have no right to lecture Indonesians, now that they are trying to develop, too.

It is hard not to feel a sense of a tragedy in the making, and those Indonesians who have reached an income and education level where they can afford to think about the environment share this sense of being overwhelmed by global capitalism.

For a developing country like Indonesia, plugging into the global market often means a brutal ultimatum: Jobs or trees? You can't have both. This is globalization's dark side. There is a problem with unemployment, so any developer who can sell promises of employment will get support. Environmentalists get labeled as against employment and get treated as outsiders.

In developing countries environmental laws are rarely enforced and polluters can easily bribe inspectors.

Counter-claim

The same growth that is polluting its environment is also producing a middle class with an environmental awareness, as happened in the West. The question is whether that middle class reaches critical mass before the environmental degradation does.